|
Stone Circles:
(Form and Function)
|
The Chronology of Stone Circles: |
With approximately 1,000 stone circles in the British Isles, there is no
question that the islands were host to a peopple for whom the circular
shape it was the homeland of the stone-circle builders for thousands of
years. In Britain, the stone-circle building phase was preceded by a short
period of 'Henge'
building. However, there are also stone-circles outside the British Isles,
and some are considerably older....
|
9,000 BC |
Gobekli Tepe,
Turkey. The oldest known megalithic temple/circle in the world. |
| |
|
|
4,500 BC |
Nabta, Egypt. Oldest known stone circle.
Placed on the Tropic of Cancer. |
|
4,000 BC |
Cromleque dos Almendres, Portugal. Twin circles. Possibly the oldest
in Europe. |
|
3,800 BC |
Xaghra circle,
Gozo, Malta. (location of
Hypogeum II) |
|
3,300 BC |
First British circular enclosures of earthen banks (1) |
|
3,250 BC |
Newgrange (stone-circle), Llandegai I Henge (1) |
|
3,200 BC |
Stonehenge
I, Barford Henge, Arminghall Henge (1) |
|
3,100 BC |
Ballynoe, Carles (1) |
|
2,950 BC |
Stennes
(1) |
|
2,600 BC |
Stonehenge
II,
Avebury
(1) |
|
2,500 BC |
Early Recumbent Circles (1) - (Lunar observation) |
|
2,400 BC |
Arbor Low
(1) |
|
2,350 BC |
Merry
Maidens (1) |
|
2,300 BC |
Stonehenge III,
Rollrights, Woodhenge (1) |
|
2,200 BC |
Llandegai II Henge, Druid's Circle (1) |
|
2,000 BC |
Callanish
(1) |
|
1,900 BC
|
Berrybrae
recumbent () |
|
No stone-circles appear to
have been built in N. Europe after 1,500 BC (2) |
(After
Burl - 1.)
| The
Classification of Stone-circles: |
The classification of stone circles.
The plain stone-circle (one which is circular),
is not as common as might be first expected. There are now several
classifications of 'circles', such as:
Oval,
Ellipse,
Egg-Type I, Egg-Type II,
Recumbent, Henge, Henge (1A), Henge (1B), Henge (1C), Henge (II), Henge (IIB), Circle-Henge, Ring-Cairn, Kerb-Cairn, Flattened Circle A, Flattened Circle B, Flattened Circle C, Flattened Circle D, Timber, Concentric, Sub-circular, Four-poster, Axial...
(Enough... enough...)
The very fact that so many of these categories are determined
by the shape of the 'circle', and that circles are classified
according to their shape confirms the suspicions of Prof. Alexander Thom, who
first proposed the existence of a 'megalithic yard' and thereby, that there is an underlying geometry
that determined the shape of many of the more significant European stone-circles.
(More
about the Megalithic Yard)
|
The Purpose of Stone Circles: |
Stone-circle development occurred around
the ancient world for thousands of years,
and there are several different types of circle, with several showing changes
in use and design over time. Many stone circles have been shown to
have strong associations with both geometry and astronomy, and in several
examples, the specific
location of the circle can be shown to have been more important than the
availability of stone.
Even more remarkable than the stones
themselves is our ignorance over their original purpose. Geoffrey of Monmouth, in 1135 wrote that the builders of
Stonehenge originated in the 'remotest confines of Africa' and that
the stones were 'transported by giants', while Fergusson attempted to tackle the subject in 1880, concluding
that they were originally constructed as 'holding pens', 'meeting places',
or 'memorials of great battles'.
The evolution of the stone circle reveals
much about their probable purposes. It has long been suspected that
henges were designed in order to create an
artificial horizon line, and in Scotland,
recumbent circles have been shown to
have had an intimate lunar association (see below). It is now reasonably
accepted that most circles included astronomical orientations and
alignments, and geometry,
with the obvious inclusion of rituals of death (i.e. at
Xaghra circle, Malta
and Stonehenge, England). The discovery of
specific astronomical purposes behind the stone circles (see below), is far
removed from the earlier ideas of Fergusson (although we are still a long
way from understanding them).
|
Stone Circles and Astronomy: |
Although it is not possible to say that
all stone circles were built with an astronomical consideration...
It is clear that
many share an intimate association with both astronomy and landscape.
A connection to both lunar and solar observations has been
recognised in the design of several prominent stone-circles such as
Callanish, Stonehenge, Almendres, Newgrange and the numerous RSC's (recumbent
stone circles) of Scotland, which are identified with lunar observation.
|
There are only two latitudes
in which the Moon's maximum declination is the same as the latitude,
meaning that at its maximum elongation it goes through the zenith
(directly overhead). These two latitudes are 38.33˚ N (Almendres),
and 51° 10' N (Stonehenge).
|
As well as being
associated to Stonehenge, Almendres has a secondary lunar connection
with another two significant monuments in Portugal, which are the
Zambujeiro passage-mound and the 'cromeleque'
da Xarez (The
reconstructed 'cromeleque' da Xarez is in-fact a
quadrangle). The three sites form a 50km alignment which has been
suggested to be related to the spring moon (110°).
(Click here for more on this subject)
The connection between stone circles and
astronomy is not however, so clean-cut. A visit to almost any circle is all
one needs to realise that although certain stones were selected to
demonstrate a preference for orientation (with portal stones or through a
gradation in height), the stones of most circles were placed evenly apart
around the circumference, having a symbolic placement rather than a
functional one. The choice of stone over wood added to the selection and
transport of specific types of stones over long distances also demonstrates the
importance of stone itself to the circle builders.
The Nabta stone-circle is the only megalithic
construction of its kind in all Egypt. It is positioned exactly on the Tropic of
Cancer.
The people at Nabta
built an observatory — a 12-foot (4-meter) circle of huge slabs of stone,
with four pairs of taller stones aligned opposite each other. Two pair
provided a "window" on the solstice sunrise, while the other two aligned
on an almost-perfect north-south axis. Nabta's
calendar circle was used at least 6,000 years ago, and probably earlier
Nabtans erected
several other megaliths in the area - dark stones up to 3m above the
desert landscape, scattered across a square mile. Some of the megaliths
formed north-south and east-west sightlines, like a giant stone compass,
and probably remained visible when the summer inundation filled the Nabta
basin.
"We see two kinds
of astronomy here — solstice alignments and cardinal alignments," says J.
McKim Malville, a professor of astronomy at the University of Colorado at
Boulder and a member of the team that confirmed the alignments in a paper
published earlier this year.
"The astronomical
nature of the site was clear while we were there," says Malville. "These
alignments are so simple and straightforward, there's no doubt about
them."
Because of Nabta's proximity to the Tropic of Cancer, the
noon sun is at its zenith about three weeks before and three weeks after the
summer solstice, preventing upright objects from casting shadows.
(More about
Nabta)
The Stone circle at Castle Rigg,
Cumbria was one of the most successful that Alexander Thom came across
in terms of combining astronomical sight-lines with the geometric
construction of the stone circle itself. Thom himself pointed out the
remarkable difficulties in trying to find a site where the skyline
yielded the exact right properties to match the astronomic requirements
and geometry of the circle itself. Although the geometric connections
with the landscape are not immediately visible today, it has become
clear that the builders were endeavouring to express, control or 'come
to terms with something'. In addition, J. Glover made some interesting
comments regarding Castle Rigg, namely that the specific placement of
certain stones enhanced the shadow-effects caused by the sun at specific
times of the year. As the circle was built onto a gentle slope, the
largest stone creates a shadow nearly a half-mile long at sunset on
midsummer's day.
|
The Geometry of Stone-circles: |
The geometry of stone circles
Burl makes note of the 'mistaken
coincidence' about the number of stones in the British stone-circles. He
says of it:
'From Brodgar,
where there was once 60 stones, to the Stripple stones with a probable
thirty, the builders may have counted in multiples of six. Stennes had
twelve. The inner and outer rings at Balfarg have been computed at
twenty-four and twelve respectively. Twenty-four has been suggested for
Cairnpappel, thirty-six for
Arbor Low, and the same number for the devils
quoits'. (3)

Thom radically suggested that geometry was used in the
design of certain prehistoric
sites (Avebury, left). He surveyed hundreds of European megaliths and concluded that
fundamental mathematic principles, based upon a common unit of measurement
(which he called the
megalithic yard),
had been applied in the
design of certain sites. As the megalithic tradition in Europe can be traced
back to at least 4,000 BC, if not earlier still, his work is still not
accepted by most archaeologists, although such a strong presence of
geometry should not be ignored, as is clearly suggests that the design of
many sacred sites seems to have been based on a sophisticated
philosophy of sacred science such as was taught centuries later by the
Pythagorean school.
As
Professor Thom observes in his book Megalithic Sites in Britain
(1967):
“It
is remarkable that one thousand years before the earliest mathematicians
of classical Greece, people in these islands not only had a practical
knowledge of geometry and were capable of setting out elaborate
geometrical designs but could also set out ellipses based on the
Pythagorean triangles.”
John Michell showed in the 1970's that the
several stone circles of South-Western England shared a geometric
relationship to each other.
(European Stone
'Quadrangles' and their Latitudes)
(Geometric
Alignments)
|
Stone circle facts:
The circumference of the Stonehenge sarsen-stone-circle (100ft), is
the same as that of the flattened top of
Silbury hill.

The same measurement
is also exactly one 'quarter aurora', a standard unit of Egyptian
area measurement.
(More
about the Geometry of Giza)
|
| Recumbent
Stone Circles (RSC's) |
Scotland is home to hundreds of 'Recumbent' stone circles.
These circles are usually fairly small, the largest being (Innesmill
(B5/1 at 110 ft diameter). Recumbent circles in the Grampians of Scotland have been shown to have a primary
association with the observation of the extreme setting points on the lunar
cycle. They are defined by a prominent 'recumbent' stone, positioned
horizontally, so that the moon sets behind it at both extremes of its cycle,
and upon which stones cup-marks are often found.
In Aberdeenshire, with a mean
latitude of 57° 30's, the moon at its maximum, will rise at 155°
SSE, and set at 205° SSW. Of the 48
recumbent's where it is possible to plot their
axis, 45 have recumbent between these limits. The remaining were placed at 230°,
231° and 232°, the min moon setting. (Ref: Burl. Stone circles).
Aberdeenshire alone has up to 99 recorded examples,
with diameters ranging from 18.2 m to 24.4 m. (6)
It is an interesting fact that the only
recumbent circles found outside of Scotland, are in the Ross-Carbery area of
Ireland, which places them too far south to make them any use as lunar
observatories, and have in fact been shown to be solar in their
orientation. Cope (4), makes note of the
Drombeg RSC, where the sun has been observed setting at midwinter
(solstice), directly into a notch in the landscape behind the recumbent
stone.
The largest recumbent stone in Scotland is at
Old Keig, Aberdeenshire, which at an
estimated 53 tons, and still sitting perfectly horizontally, is a testimony
to the engineering skills of the builders. The Old Keig recumbent was
positioned so that its length (5m), was such that the moon rose at its
minimum and maximum settings (over the 18.6 yr cycle) from behind the left
and right 'flankers', gliding along the surface of the recumbent (due to its
specific latitude).
(Prehistoric Scotland Homepage)
England is home to examples of numerous
double circles, as well as several 'Triple-circles' such as 'The
Hurlers', Merrivale,
Stanton Drew,
Avebury,
Thornborough and
Grey Wethers,
to name but a few. Their exact purpose is still only to be guessed at, but a
geometric and/or astronomic association is predicted . (More to follow
soon...)

(From left to right:
Clava cairns,
The Pipers,
The
Hurlers and Avebury).
The theme of triple-aligned
circles is also common to
Henges, such as the
Priddy circles, and Thornborough.

The three Devil's Arrow's
(left), are aligned towards the Thornborough
Henges (right).
The Devil's Arrows are also aligned to other monuments
which show a similar 'elbow' feature.
An example of a 'Triple RSC' may be found
at Loanhead of Daviot, in Scotland, where
the three Neolithic recumbent circles are aligned. The circle in Daviot
churchyard was removed in 1820, and all that remains of New Craig is the
recumbent, its flankers and a few odd stones now built into a field wall.
(4)
(Article - Nov 2009). Oxford: Between the rivers
Thames and Cherwell. A team from Museum of London Archaeology (MOLA)
has been excavating parts of the 3.7 hectare site. The excavation has
revealed evidence of three large prehistoric 'ring ditches' along with some
evidence of possible associated cremation burials.
(Click here for full Article)
Stone Quadrangles:
There are a handful
of megalithic 'Cromeleques' which whilst retaining an essential
geometric design - are not circles. The famous Carnac alignments in
France have at one end a stone-circle, and at the other lies a less
well known 'cromeleque' which is in-fact a quadrangular
enclosure, which has raised debate over the fact that the angle created
between the opposite diagonal corners appears to have a relationship
to the latitude upon which it sits. While this may at first sound
obscure, the 'station-stones' at Stonehenge also form a quadrangle
which similarly mirror the latitude upon which it was constructed.
The smaller sides
of the Station-stone quadrangle are orientated at approximately
51° 10', which is the same as the latitude upon which it sits.
Although
Stonehenge is commonly known for
its solar orientation, the original construction has been identified
as having had a lunar orientation, and the site was constructed on the
exact latitude at which the maximum settings of the sun and moon are
at
90° to each other. The same is true for the Crucuno monument
at Carnac which
was located at the unique latitude on the Earth at which the solstice
sun, both summer and winter, form a perfect Pythagorean triangle
relative to the parallel of latitude, that is to the east-west, equinoxial axis of the site. In turn, this 3:4:5 triangle is the first
of the Pythagorean triangular set.

Quadrangular enclosures at Stonehenge
(left), and Crucuno (right).
It is thought that the rectangle of
stones (Crucuno), could have been set up for astronomical
observations, as not only do the east-west sides align to the
equinox sunrise and sunset, but perhaps more importantly, the
diagonals align to the both the solstice sunrise and sunset positions,
similar to the four 'station-stones' at Stonehenge. It has also
been suggested that the positions of various major moon rise and
moonset positions are indicated at the
Crucuno quadrangle, whose dimensions
encompasses an approximate 3:4:5 triangle.

The Xarez 'cromeleque', Monsaraz, Portugal.
The
Xarez cromeleque
in Portugal is also a stone 'quadrangle'. Although the original layout
of the monument has been questioned, the archaeologist Dr. Pires Gonçalves
concluded after several years research on the site that its original
design was quadrangular. Perhaps of equal importance is the fact that
it belongs to an alignment of sites stretching over 50km, towards the
Almendres circle, with an azimuth
which closely conforms to the full moon in spring
(5).
(More about
the Xarez-Almendres Alignment)
Both Stonehenge and Almendres are located on the latitudes of the extremes of
the moons 18.6 year cycle, so that it passes directly overhead on its zenith
at full moon. In addition, Stonehenge is located on the unique latitude at
which the maximum lunar and solar settings are at 90 °
to each other.
(More about
the Cromeleque da Xarez)
|
Gallery of Stone-circles: |
Stone circles from around the world.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Stonehenge, England |
Avebury, England |
Rollrights, England |
Castlerig, England |
The Hurlers, England |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Beltany, Ireland. |
Drombeg, Ireland. |
Carnac, France
|
Petit St. Bernard, France/Italy |
Er Lannic, France |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Xaghra Circle, Malta |
|
Gobekli Tepe, Turkey. |
|
Cromleque
dos Almendres, Portugal |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Brodgar, Scotland |
Callanish, Scotland |
Stennes, Scotland. |
Old Keig, Scotland |
Other stone-circles.
|
Name |
Location |
Description |
|
Nabta |
Egypt
|
This stone circle is only a part of the
important megalithic complex at Nabta, located on the tropic of
Capricorn. |
|
Nr Tangiers |
Morocco
|
A stone circle was found near Tangiers. (9). |
|
Los Milhares |
Spain |
A chambered mound
surrounded by a stone circle.
|
|
Talati de Dalt |
Spain |
A Stone Circle and 'talayot'
towers.
|
|
Trepuco |
Spain |
A Stone Circle and 'talayot'. |
Others :
- Libya, Syria, Jordan and
Lebanon are reported to have hundreds of circles and free-standing stones. (9).
|