Featured Stone Circles

Related Pages.

Astronomy.

Henges.

Passage-mounds.

 

Index of Ancient Sites.

Homepage.

 

 

Add to Favourites.

About Us.

A-Z Site Index.

Gift Shop.

Contact Us

 

        Stone Circles: (Form and Function)

 

 

 

 

   The Chronology of Stone Circles:

With approximately 1,000 stone circles in the British Isles, there is no question that the islands were host to a peopple for whom the circular shape it was the homeland of the stone-circle builders for thousands of years. In Britain, the stone-circle building phase was preceded by a short period of  'Henge' building. However, there are also stone-circles outside the British Isles, and some are considerably older....

9,000 BC Gobekli Tepe, Turkey. The oldest known megalithic temple/circle in the world.
   
4,500 BC Nabta, Egypt. Oldest known stone circle. Placed on the Tropic of Cancer.
4,000 BC Cromleque dos Almendres, Portugal. Twin circles. Possibly the oldest in Europe.
3,800 BC Xaghra circle, Gozo, Malta. (location of Hypogeum II)
3,300 BC First British circular enclosures of earthen banks (1)
3,250 BC Newgrange (stone-circle), Llandegai I Henge (1)
3,200 BC  Stonehenge I, Barford Henge, Arminghall Henge (1)
3,100 BC Ballynoe, Carles (1)
2,950 BC Stennes (1)
2,600 BC Stonehenge II, Avebury (1)
2,500 BC Early Recumbent Circles (1) - (Lunar observation)
2,400 BC Arbor Low (1)
2,350 BC Merry Maidens (1)
2,300 BC Stonehenge III, Rollrights, Woodhenge (1)
2,200 BC Llandegai II Henge, Druid's Circle (1)
2,000 BC Callanish  (1)
1,900 BC Berrybrae recumbent ()

No stone-circles appear to have been built in N. Europe after 1,500 BC (2)

(After Burl - 1.)

 

 

   The Classification of Stone-circles:

The classification of stone circles.

The plain stone-circle (one which is circular), is not as common as might be first expected. There are now several classifications of 'circles', such as:

Oval, Ellipse, Egg-Type I, Egg-Type II, Recumbent, Henge, Henge (1A), Henge (1B), Henge (1C), Henge (II), Henge (IIB), Circle-Henge, Ring-Cairn, Kerb-Cairn, Flattened Circle A, Flattened Circle B, Flattened Circle C, Flattened Circle D, Timber, Concentric, Sub-circular, Four-poster, Axial... (Enough... enough...)

The very fact that so many of these categories are determined by the shape of the 'circle', and that circles are classified according to their shape confirms the suspicions of Prof. Alexander Thom, who first proposed the existence of a 'megalithic yard' and thereby, that there is an underlying geometry that determined the shape of many of the more significant European stone-circles.

(More about the Megalithic Yard)

 

 

 

   The Purpose of Stone Circles:

Stone-circle development occurred around the ancient world for thousands of years, and there are several different types of circle, with several showing changes in use and design over time. Many stone circles have been shown to have strong associations with both geometry and astronomy, and in several examples, the specific location of the circle can be shown to have been more important than the availability of stone.

Even more remarkable than the stones themselves is our ignorance over their original purpose. Geoffrey of Monmouth, in 1135 wrote that the builders of Stonehenge originated in the 'remotest confines of Africa' and that the stones were 'transported by giants', while Fergusson attempted to tackle the subject in 1880, concluding that they were originally constructed as 'holding pens', 'meeting places', or 'memorials of great battles'. 

The evolution of the stone circle reveals much about their probable purposes. It has long been suspected that henges were designed in order to create an artificial horizon line, and in Scotland, recumbent circles have been shown to have had an intimate lunar association (see below). It is now reasonably accepted that most circles included astronomical orientations and alignments, and geometry, with the obvious inclusion of rituals of death (i.e. at Xaghra circle, Malta and Stonehenge, England). The discovery of specific astronomical purposes behind the stone circles (see below), is far removed from the earlier ideas of Fergusson (although we are still a long way from understanding them).

 

 

Stone-circle Facts:

Excavations under the Xaghra stone circle on Gozo, Malta have revealed the presence of a second Hypogeum, which was built from huge slabs of stone and has so far revealed the presence of over 70 bodies.

(Click here for more about the Xaghra circle and the Hypogeum II)

 

 

 

   Stone Circles and Astronomy:

                Although it is not possible to say that all stone circles were built with an astronomical consideration...            It is clear that many share an intimate association with both astronomy and landscape.

A connection to both lunar and solar observations has been recognised in the design of several prominent stone-circles such as Callanish, Stonehenge, Almendres, Newgrange and the numerous RSC's (recumbent stone circles) of Scotland, which are identified with lunar observation.

There are only two latitudes in which the Moon's maximum declination is the same as the latitude, meaning that at its maximum elongation it goes through the zenith (directly overhead). These two latitudes are 38.33˚ N (Almendres), and 51° 10' N (Stonehenge).

As well as being associated to Stonehenge, Almendres has a secondary lunar connection with another two significant monuments in Portugal, which are the Zambujeiro passage-mound and the 'cromeleque' da Xarez (The reconstructed 'cromeleque' da Xarez is in-fact a quadrangle). The three sites form a 50km alignment which has been suggested to be related to the spring moon (110°).

(Click here for more on this subject)

 

The connection between stone circles and astronomy is not however, so clean-cut. A visit to almost any circle is all one needs to realise that although certain stones were selected to demonstrate a preference for orientation (with portal stones or through a gradation in height), the stones of most circles were placed evenly apart around the circumference, having a symbolic placement rather than a functional one. The choice of stone over wood added to the selection and transport of specific types of stones over long distances also demonstrates the importance of stone itself to the circle builders.

 

The Nabta stone-circle is the only megalithic construction of its kind in all Egypt. It is positioned exactly on the Tropic of Cancer.

The people at Nabta built an observatory — a 12-foot (4-meter) circle of huge slabs of stone, with four pairs of taller stones aligned opposite each other. Two pair provided a "window" on the solstice sunrise, while the other two aligned on an almost-perfect north-south axis. Nabta's calendar circle was used at least 6,000 years ago, and probably earlier

Nabtans erected several other megaliths in the area - dark stones up to 3m above the desert landscape, scattered across a square mile. Some of the megaliths formed north-south and east-west sightlines, like a giant stone compass, and probably remained visible when the summer inundation filled the Nabta basin.

"We see two kinds of astronomy here — solstice alignments and cardinal alignments," says J. McKim Malville, a professor of astronomy at the University of Colorado at Boulder and a member of the team that confirmed the alignments in a paper published earlier this year.

"The astronomical nature of the site was clear while we were there," says Malville. "These alignments are so simple and straightforward, there's no doubt about them."

Because of Nabta's proximity to the Tropic of Cancer, the noon sun is at its zenith about three weeks before and three weeks after the summer solstice, preventing upright objects from casting shadows.

(More about Nabta)

The Stone circle at Castle Rigg, Cumbria was one of the most successful that Alexander Thom came across in terms of combining astronomical sight-lines with the geometric construction of the stone circle itself. Thom himself pointed out the remarkable difficulties in trying to find a site where the skyline yielded the exact right properties to match the astronomic requirements and geometry of the circle itself. Although the geometric connections with the landscape are not immediately visible today, it has become clear that the builders were endeavouring to express, control or 'come to terms with something'. In addition, J. Glover made some interesting comments regarding Castle Rigg, namely that the specific placement of certain stones enhanced the shadow-effects caused by the sun at specific times of the year. As the circle was built onto a gentle slope, the largest stone creates a shadow nearly a half-mile long at sunset on midsummer's day.

 

 

   The Geometry of Stone-circles:

 The geometry of stone circles

Burl makes note of the 'mistaken coincidence' about the number of stones in the British stone-circles. He says of it:

'From Brodgar, where there was once 60 stones, to the Stripple stones with a probable thirty, the builders may have counted in multiples of six. Stennes had twelve. The inner and outer rings at Balfarg have been computed at twenty-four and twelve respectively. Twenty-four has been suggested for Cairnpappel, thirty-six for Arbor Low, and the same number for the devils quoits'. (3)

 

Thom radically suggested that geometry was used in the design of certain prehistoric sites (Avebury, left). He surveyed hundreds of European megaliths and concluded that fundamental mathematic principles, based upon a common unit of measurement (which he called the megalithic yard), had been applied in the design of certain sites. As the megalithic tradition in Europe can be traced back to at least 4,000 BC, if not earlier still, his work is still not accepted by most archaeologists, although such a strong presence of geometry should not be ignored, as is clearly suggests that the design of many sacred sites seems to have been based on a sophisticated philosophy of sacred science such as was taught centuries later by the Pythagorean school.  As Professor Thom observes in his book Megalithic Sites in Britain (1967):

 

It is remarkable that one thousand years before the earliest mathematicians of classical Greece, people in these islands not only had a practical knowledge of geometry and were capable of setting out elaborate geometrical designs but could also set out ellipses based on the Pythagorean triangles.”

John Michell showed in the 1970's that the several stone circles of South-Western England shared a geometric relationship to each other.

(European Stone 'Quadrangles' and their Latitudes)

(Geometric Alignments)

 

 

Stone circle facts:

The circumference of the Stonehenge sarsen-stone-circle (100ft), is the same as that of the flattened top of Silbury hill.

The same measurement is also exactly one 'quarter aurora', a standard unit of Egyptian area measurement.

(More about the Geometry of Giza)

 

 

 

   Recumbent Stone Circles (RSC's)

Scotland is home to hundreds of 'Recumbent' stone circles. These circles are usually fairly small, the largest being (Innesmill (B5/1 at 110 ft diameter). Recumbent circles in the Grampians of Scotland have been shown to have a primary association with the observation of the extreme setting points on the lunar cycle. They are defined by a prominent 'recumbent' stone, positioned horizontally, so that the moon sets behind it at both extremes of its cycle, and upon which stones cup-marks are often found.

In Aberdeenshire, with a mean latitude of 57° 30's, the moon at its maximum, will rise at 155° SSE, and set at 205° SSW. Of the 48 recumbent's where it is possible to plot their axis, 45 have recumbent between these limits. The remaining were placed at 230°, 231° and 232°, the min moon setting. (Ref: Burl. Stone circles).

Aberdeenshire alone has up to 99 recorded examples, with diameters ranging from 18.2 m to 24.4 m. (6)

It is an interesting fact that the only recumbent circles found outside of Scotland, are in the Ross-Carbery area of Ireland, which places them too far south to make them any use as lunar observatories, and have in fact been shown to be solar in their orientation. Cope (4), makes note of the Drombeg RSC, where the sun has been observed setting at midwinter (solstice), directly into a notch in the landscape behind the recumbent stone.

The largest recumbent stone in Scotland is at Old Keig, Aberdeenshire, which at an estimated 53 tons, and still sitting perfectly horizontally, is a testimony to the engineering skills of the builders. The Old Keig recumbent was positioned so that its length (5m), was such that the moon rose at its minimum and maximum settings (over the 18.6 yr cycle) from behind the left and right 'flankers', gliding along the surface of the recumbent (due to its specific latitude).

(Prehistoric Scotland Homepage)

 

 

 

   Triple Circles:

England is home to examples of numerous double circles, as well as several 'Triple-circles' such as 'The Hurlers', Merrivale, Stanton Drew, Avebury, Thornborough and Grey Wethers, to name but a few. Their exact purpose is still only to be guessed at, but a geometric and/or astronomic association is predicted . (More to follow soon...)

(From left to right: Clava cairns, The Pipers, The Hurlers and Avebury).

The theme of triple-aligned circles is also common to Henges, such as the Priddy circles, and Thornborough.

Devil's Arrows.   Thornborough Henges.

The three Devil's Arrow's (left), are aligned towards the Thornborough Henges (right).

The Devil's Arrows are also aligned to other monuments which show a similar 'elbow' feature.

An example of a 'Triple RSC' may be found at Loanhead of Daviot, in Scotland, where the three Neolithic recumbent circles are aligned. The circle in Daviot churchyard was removed in 1820, and all that remains of New Craig is the recumbent, its flankers and a few odd stones now built into a field wall. (4)

(Article - Nov 2009). Oxford: Between the rivers Thames and Cherwell.  A team from Museum of London Archaeology (MOLA) has been excavating parts of the 3.7 hectare site. The excavation has revealed evidence of three large prehistoric 'ring ditches' along with some evidence of possible associated cremation burials.

(Click here for full Article)

 

 

   Stone Quadrangles:

Stone Quadrangles:

There are a handful of megalithic 'Cromeleques' which whilst retaining an essential geometric design - are not circles. The famous Carnac alignments in France have at one end a stone-circle, and at the other lies a less well known 'cromeleque' which is in-fact a quadrangular enclosure, which has raised debate over the fact that the angle created between the opposite diagonal corners appears to have a relationship to the latitude upon which it sits. While this may at first sound obscure, the 'station-stones' at Stonehenge also form a quadrangle which similarly mirror the latitude upon which it was constructed.

The smaller sides of the Station-stone quadrangle are orientated at approximately  51° 10', which is the same as the latitude upon which it sits.

Although Stonehenge is commonly known for its solar orientation, the original construction has been identified as having had a lunar orientation, and the site was constructed on the exact latitude at which the maximum settings of the sun and moon are at 90° to each other. The same is true for the Crucuno monument at Carnac which was located at the unique latitude on the Earth at which the solstice sun, both summer and winter, form a perfect Pythagorean triangle relative to the parallel of latitude, that is to the east-west, equinoxial axis of the site. In turn, this 3:4:5 triangle is the first of the Pythagorean triangular set.

  

Quadrangular enclosures at Stonehenge (left), and Crucuno (right).

It is thought that the rectangle of stones (Crucuno), could have been set up for astronomical observations, as not only do the east-west sides align to the equinox sunrise and sunset, but perhaps more importantly, the diagonals align to the both the solstice sunrise and sunset positions, similar to the four 'station-stones' at Stonehenge. It has also been suggested that the positions of various major moon rise and moonset positions are indicated at the Crucuno quadrangle, whose dimensions encompasses an approximate 3:4:5 triangle.

xarez

The Xarez 'cromeleque', Monsaraz, Portugal.

The Xarez cromeleque in Portugal is also a stone 'quadrangle'. Although the original layout of the monument has been questioned, the archaeologist Dr. Pires Gonçalves concluded after several years research on the site that its original design was quadrangular. Perhaps of equal importance is the fact that it belongs to an alignment of sites stretching over 50km, towards the Almendres circle, with an azimuth which closely conforms to the full moon in spring (5).

(More about the Xarez-Almendres Alignment)

Both Stonehenge and Almendres are located on the latitudes of the extremes of the moons 18.6 year cycle, so that it passes directly overhead on its zenith at full moon. In addition, Stonehenge is located on the unique latitude at which the maximum lunar and solar settings are at 90° to each other.

(More about the Cromeleque da Xarez)

 

 

 

   Gallery of Stone-circles:

Stone circles from around the world.

 
 
Other stone-circles.
 
Name Location Description
Nabta Egypt

This stone circle is only a part of the important megalithic complex at Nabta, located on the tropic of Capricorn.

Nr Tangiers Morocco

A stone circle was found near Tangiers. (9).

Los Milhares Spain

A chambered mound surrounded by a stone circle.

Talati de Dalt

Spain

A Stone Circle and 'talayot' towers.

Trepuco

Spain

A Stone Circle and 'talayot'.

Others :

- Libya, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon are reported to have hundreds of circles and free-standing stones. (9). 

 

 The 'Rough Guide' to ancient sites from around the world.

 

References:

1). A. Burl. Rings of Stone. 1979. Book Club Assoc.
2). A. Service & J. Bradbery. Megaliths and their Mysteries. 1979. Macmillan.
3). Burl. A. Prehistoric Henges. 1997. Shire publ.
4). D. Sullivan. Ley Lines: A Comprehensive Guide to Alignments. 1999. Piatkus press.
5). http://www.crookscape.org/textjulb2005/text04.html
6). http://www.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/archaeology/special/recumbent.asp
7). P. Deveraux and I. Thomson. The Ley Hunters Companion. 1979. Thames and Hudson.
9). Rene Noorbergen. Secrets of the Lost Races. 1977. New English Library.

 

About Us Homepage  |  A-Z Site Index  |  Gift Shop  |  Contact-Us